Construction draws and remote acceptance
Concealed work, progress claims, remote acceptance – proven before it is covered.
Why the recording is the weak point
Reinforcement before the pour. Insulation before the drywall. Pipework before the screed. Once covered, the only evidence is a photo somebody took – or says they took.
Progress payments are released on those photos. The party paying is usually the financing bank, not the contractor.
Verified offline- Capture
- Construction draws
- Moment
- 2026-09-22 · 14:07:41 UTC (± 90 s)
- Presence
- device + independent device
- Level
- Witnessed
Progress claim on a financed build
Capture
The site manager records the concealed work. A second device on site – the surveyor's, the client's – witnesses the capture.
Proof
The site diary entry carries a proof: real site, real moment, complete recording, both parties present.
Decision
The bank releases the draw against proven progress. Later disputes about what was under the concrete are settled by the record, not by memory.
What the proof establishes
- What was there before it was covered.
- When it was there.
- Who was present.
- That the recording was not edited afterwards.
Financing banks, project owners, insurers of construction risk; contractors benefit from faster draws.
Witnessed for concealed work and acceptance, Certified for public or high-value projects.
- Public customer statement, Ford Protect (warranty): remote photo verification "eliminated on-site inspections by 24 %".
Bring one workflow. We bring the proof layer.